The British Council home page
 in English home | Journal home 
     
   

A lesson out of the classroom

   
by Gaynor Doyle

 

   

from:
The Journal
No. 13 April 2002

Gaynor Doyle is a teacher at the British Council, Parede

© authors and The British Council 2002

permission to reproduce articles from the Journal will normally be granted but must be obtained in advance from the editor. Views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of he British Council

As part of a move to integrate culture into the language course programme, and further develop a good relationship with my class of advanced young adult learners, I decided to suggest an outing to the Gilbert and George art exhibition. Here is an account of what we did.

Before the visit

My Saturday afternoon group of advanced young adult learners were interested in going to see the Gilbert and George exhibition being held at the Centro Cultural de Belém from 11th January to 14th April 2002. The group are generally very keen and motivated and, with this exhibition on their doorstep, it was a great opportunity for them to learn something about contemporary British art.


I searched for some information about the artists on the Internet and then looked at what I found with the group. It sounded a bit strange as the artists use microscopic images of bodily fluids such as urine, faecal matter and sperm samples that they photograph and blow up to create their renowned multipanels or sculptures which form the basis of their work. However, the artists are extremely well known contemporary artists in Britain and this was a high profile exhibition, supported by the British Council.

We set a date for the trip so that instead of our normal 3-hour classroom based lesson on a Saturday afternoon we would go to Belém. In order to prepare for the students' visit, I went along to the exhibition myself the week before. As well as the main works mentioned above, there was four hours of video footage from various sources such as The South Bank Show and other documentaries made about the lives of these famous artists. I therefore planned to create a worksheet of questions based on their lives and this exhibition.

Before my visit to the exhibition I must admit I didn't know much about the artists, only that their work was known to be provocative and shocking. After my visit I could only agree. Not all of the exhibition can be described in this way; some aspects are just colourful, urban scenes depicting youth, fear, social vices and so on. There are many images of naked Gilbert and George at every turn, not shocking perhaps but not particularly aesthetically pleasing. But the vulgarity was overloaded - I began to feel uncomfortable about taking my students, particularly the younger 15 year olds to this event.
I went back to my group the following week and told them my opinion of the exhibition and voiced my concerns about taking them. However, the group decided (unanimously) that they would like to see it for themselves.

The visit

So, the following Saturday, a beautiful sunny February afternoon, we visited the exhibition. There were seven students (including one male). Their reactions were pretty similar to mine. I knew they wouldn't understand some of the vocabulary printed on the panels (words generally considered taboo, in polite company) - so you get the picture, it was up to me to enlighten them! This group are usually fun to be with and full of smiles, but I have to say I've never seen so many grimacing faces in front of me before. The best comment of the day came from an extremely bright fifteen-year-old who said "Gilbert and George are just obsessed with big brown things".

The students didn't like the exhibition and overall felt it presented a poor image of British art. For my part, although I'd anticipated questions about the artists and the unusual vocabulary, I still felt rather uncomfortable. Although I'd given them prior warning about the content of the exhibition, I felt responsible for making them aware of some seedier aspects of life in the UK and questioned whether integrating this kind of culture into my teaching was what I should be doing.
However, it was an interesting, thought provoking and ultimately very productive afternoon. The students completed the questionnaire I'd given them and obviously talked a lot, in English, about what they saw. It certainly made them think and they learnt something about contemporary British art (or one representation of it). We all got to know each other a bit better and we were in a
beautiful setting in the warm sunshine, lucky for us because the exhibition didn't offer any beauty or much positivity.

Follow up

As a follow up, the students split into two groups to work on two writing tasks: one was to put together a review of the exhibition and the other, a letter to the director of the British Council asking why it chose to support art of this type.
They worked on these two tasks by brainstorming ideas together, then producing a first draft at home which was edited and improved upon in subsequent lessons. Producing their work on the computer enabled me to add comments to help them edit their work.
The students (and the teacher) may not have liked the art, but the experience and the work that came out of the visit was extremely valuable. They were all fully engaged in doing these writing tasks since the work was based on their own experience and something they had very clear opinions about - and that means they were truly communicative tasks.

The students´ review

Gilbert and George are two British contemporary artists and performers. They recently brought an exhibition to Lisbon's Cultural Centre in Belém.
They use different tools such as photography and painting, with very contrasting and strong colours, causing an impact which might be seen as grotesque. These two performers have a great desire to gain attention, so they try to shock as much as they can.


The main subject of their artwork is homosexuality and how the heterosexual society views and accepts this difference or not. In fact, they expose their own sex lives and options, tending to centralise their own images without any kind of reservation. This duo likes to give their sculptures a strange look, using the human body and its components to represent their ideas.

If one goes to one of Gilbert and George's exhibitions without knowing what their kind of "Art" is, one might easily get shocked, especially as their work is not known in Portugal.
As far as the true definition of "Art" is concerned, it is nothing resembling what Gilbert and George do. Their work is most probably a result of the esthetical crisis. Nowadays everything is labelled as "Art", and so the word ends up losing its meaning.

(After all, the easiest way to destroy a concept is by making it vulgar or extending it). Contemporary art is said to have wonderful qualities, deserving respect; however everything associated with it can be considered crazy.


The public in general sees art as a game for snobbish intellectuals and they can't understand how vital art is. It's difficult to see art separated from reality. The new artists try to gain attention with originality or by shocking the viewers. Maybe they'd rather not be recognised by their talent but by interesting perspectives; this is what happens with Gilbert and George.

top

The students' letter

2nd March 2002
Dear Mr.Ness,

As students of the British Council, we are writing to give our opinions about the "Gilbert and George" art exhibition that we went to see on Saturday 23rd February 2002 at the Centro Cultural de Belém. We were interested in finding out more about British art and culture but we left feeling very disappointed

Firstly, we think it is a shame that the British Council promoted an event full of foul language and vulgarity. Our teacher had to explain some unusual vocabulary to us, which we did not feel was very educational or productive. Secondly "Gilbert and George" are nothing set against the wider range of British art that could be promoted in Portugal. For example, we would like to see an event that could show us something about the history of British art.
We feel that this sort of exhibition gives a bad image of not only this Institution but also the United Kingdom. We would like to know why the British Council is interested in promoting this sort of art.
We look forward to hearing your comments. Thank you for your attention.

Level 6 students, Parede

top

The Director's reply

Dear Students

First of all, may I thank you for taking the time to write your interesting review of the Gilbert and George exhibition at the Centro Cultural de Belém and for your letter to me of 2 March. I am really delighted that you took the time to visit the exhibition, but obviously disappointed that you felt so negative about it. Of course, that's not such a bad thing either - we're all free to disagree about these things!

Art, with a capital 'A', is a very difficult thing to define. Or, rather, there are many different definitions. And whether it's painting, sculpture, or poetry, art portrays an aspect of the society in which we live, as seen by the author(s) .

Gilbert and George, I think, set out to shock and to challenge the viewer's perceptions - and they certainly succeeded with you!

You ask why The British Council is 'promoting this sort of art'. The Council never operates on its own, but always with Portuguese partners, and in this particular case the original idea for the Gilbert and George exhibition came from the Portuguese team at the Centro Cultural de Belém. They were keen to bring to Lisbon two artists (although Gilbert and George might claim to be one artist!) whom many people see as being amongst the most interesting, if controversial, in the contemporary British art world.

The newspaper 'Público' also thought that this was such an important event that they even carried a huge photograph of the event, and of Gilbert and George, on their front page on the day of the opening of the exhibition.

I understand why you might have found some of the themes and the language objectionable. But I would ask you to think again about the suggestion that the Gilbert and George exhibition gives "a bad image of the Council and of the UK". Our objective here is to help encourage partnerships and mutual understanding between Britain and Portugal, and in this case the Gilbert and George exhibition, while not being to everyone's taste, has, I believe succeeded in contributing to this objective.

Perhaps you will find the next exhibition in which we are involved more interesting - and let me quickly point out that you can still visit the 'Michael Craig-Martin' installation at the Museum of Modern Art in Sintra, but hurry as it closes at the end of this month.

But, more than anything, I would like to thank you for taking the time to write to me and for expressing your views so clearly.

Yours sincerely,

Robert Ness
Director
The British Council Portugal

top

 
Produced in Portugal by the British Council © 2002. The British Council, registered in England as a charity no. 209131, is the United Kingdom's international network for education, culture and development services.
Our privacy statement